0.007 0.005 0.005 0.006 105 730,593 0.013 0.27 0.011 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.010 0.008 15.five 0.34 0.18 0.013 0.33 0.04 1.28 0.11 0.006 35.1 382,245 0.55 0.011 0.57 0.008 0.23 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.010 0.008 five.08 0.46 0.012 0.013 0.010 0.007 0.88 0.11 0.006 73.four six,086 three.26 18.9 a 1,7005,750 7,92126,793 b, c92.0 90.0 91.0 94.0 93.0 92.0 90.0 90.0 94.0 94.0 91.7 96.5 91.0 93.0 90.0 90.0 92.0 91.0 98.0 94.MeanBelow detection limit References: a. Van Gemert [50], b.

0.007 0.005 0.005 0.006 105 730,593 0.013 0.27 0.011 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.010 0.008 15.5 0.34 0.18 0.013 0.33 0.04 1.28 0.11 0.006 35.1 382,245 0.55 0.011 0.57 0.008 0.23 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.010 0.008 5.08 0.46 0.012 0.013 0.010 0.007 0.88 0.11 0.006 73.four six,086 three.26 18.9 a 1,7005,750 7,92126,793 b, c92.0 90.0 91.0 94.0 93.0 92.0 90.0 90.0 94.0 94.0 91.7 96.5 91.0 93.0 90.0 90.0 92.0 91.0 98.0 94.MeanBelow detection limit References: a. Van Gemert [50], b. Nagata [26], c. Devos et al. [51], d. Ruth [52], e. Woodfield and Hall [53], f. Chemwatch [54], g. Evans et al. [55], h. U.S. Division of Labor [56], and i. Amoore and Hautala [57]. Imply similarity of mass spectra between actual experiment and library (NIST)Sensors 2013, 13 Table 7S. Concentrations of decreased sulfur compounds (RSC) and ammonia measured separately by GCPFPD and absorption photometry.Mal-PEG4-OH structure Order Compounds SRD0 SRD1 SRD3 SRD6 SRD9 Thresholds b (g m3) Reference[A] Concentration (g m3) 1 Hydrogen sulfide 2 Sulfur dioxide 3 Methanethiol four Dimethyl sulfide 5 Dimethyl disulfide 6 Ammonia0.02 a 0.03 61.four 0.02 18.9 81.0.02 0.03 267 3.83 196 81.0.02 0.03 0.79 0.91 35.8 81.0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.570.02 0.03 0.49 0.02 0.7924.8 1,635 4.13 7.60 47.3 1,Schiffman et al.[58] Nagata [26] Iowa State University [59] Nagata [26] Schiffman et al. [58] Nagata [26][B] Odor activity value (OAV: concentration/ threshold) 1 Hydrogen sulfide two Sulfur dioxide 3 Methanethiol 14.9 64.six four Dimethyl sulfide 0.50 5 Dimethyl disulfide 0.40 4.14 six Ammoniaa0.19 0.12 0.0.12 0.01 0.16 0.02 0.Values below detection limit are underlined (calculated as system detection limit)Sensors 2013, 13 Table 8S. The basic statistics on threshold valuesa (n = 79) of VOC.[A] Number of contrasting sources for the VOC with odor thresholds No. of sources for odor thresholds No. of VOC 0 (no information) 73 1 35 2 31 three 12 four 1 Total[B] The fundamental statistics of threshold values of VOCs (n = 79) Statistical parameter Minimum Maximum Geo meanaMean 1,929 7,576 3,SD eight,272 19,199 9,CV b 429 253Minimum Maximum Median 0.058 0.088 0.088 69,896 84,140 69,896 28 227Sum 152,379 598,518 243,We determined the 79 threshold values out on the 147 VOCs detected from strawberry samples from preceding studies(references from Table 5S) b CV (coefficient of variation) = SD/mean Sensors 2013, 13 Table 9S. Log regular connection between unique forms of odor threshold (ppbv) and molecular weight to assess the odor strength patterns of strawberry volatiles.Groups A. Ester All information Quantity of data [A] Slope c Min Max Geo imply [B] R2 Min Max Geo imply [C] pvalue Min Max Geo meana bB. Alcohol All data (n = 14)Optimal fit a (n = 28)(n = 31)C. Aldehyde Optimal All data fit (n = 9) (n = six)D. Ketone All data (n = eight) Optimal fit (n = six)Sum of all groups b All information (n = 62) Optimal match (n = 54)0.Buy(1R,2R)-2-(1-Piperidinyl)cyclohexylamine 0237 0.PMID:33523603 0296 0.0.0336 0.0406 0.0.0357 0.0507 0.0.0043 0.0161 0.0.0086 0.0187 0.0.0152 0.0253 0.0.0171 0.0366 0.0.0222 0.0351 0.0.0256 0.0415 0.0.1511 0.1906 0.1743 3.07E02 1.41E02 1.94E0.2842 0.3363 0.3188 three.49E03 1.22E03 1.75E0.5048 0.8397 0.7164 four.40E03 four.12E06 1.35E0.0231 0.4396 0.1934 6.96E01 five.16E02 two.36E0.4825 0.8833 0.8730 1.26E01 5.32E03 six.33E0.1360 0.2113 0.1885 three.69E01 two.52E01 2.82E0.3959 0.9237 0.6547 1.81E01 two.24E03 five.12E0.2171 0.4260 0.3384 1.35E04 9.00E09 7.10E0.2897 0.5743 0.4473 2.69E05 3.26E11 3.25EAfter excluding outlying information points Sum in the 4 main VOC groups (Ester, Alcohol, Aldehyde, and Ketone) c Final results of linear regression analysis between odor.